|
|
|
|
|
Mass Murder “Symposium” at Neocon Frontpage Indeed, the neocons are fanatical, warmongering, misanthropic sociopaths that need to be arrested immediately and locked up in protective custody—not for their protection but for our protection, for left alone they will attack Iran and kick off World War Three, or as former CIA spook James Woolsey describes it, World War Four (the Cold War, for the neocons, was World War Three). Speaking of Woolsey, he recently participated in a “symposium” (i.e., murder fantasy) over at the former Marxist gone to neocon seed David Horowitz’s Scaife funded website, Frontpage. Woolsey and Kenneth R. Timmerman, a neocon who is executive director of the Foundation for Democracy in Iran (even the pro-Zionist Wikipedia tells us Timmerman’s org “works to instigate an armed conflict between the US and Iran”), and Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney, a Fox News pundit and member of the Iran Policy Committee, a criminal confab made up of mostly neocons fresh out of the White House, CIA, State Department, and Pentagon, a mafia determined to inflict “regime change” on Iran through “destabilization” and “coercive diplomacy,” in other words criminal subversion of a sovereign nation, usually considered an international crime. First, Frontpage polls Woolsey about Iran’s nuclear bombs—or rather the neocon hallucination of nuclear bombs. Woolsey admits Iran has no such nukes “but it seems to be making progress on operating a cascade of gas centrifuges and claims it has enriched uranium up to fuel grade” for its declared nuclear power program, entirely legal under the NPT. “With a few centrifuges it would take them years to enrich enough uranium for a bomb, but with many thousands they could do the job in weeks. Our knowledge about this is spotty, as is our understanding of the quality of the centrifuges, which can also affect the pace substantially. Once they have enough fissile material for a bomb, a simple device of the sort of design of our Hiroshima bomb is, unfortunately, not hard to put together. A warhead for a missile would take more work.” In other words, Woolsey and the neocons don’t know jack about Iran’s nuclear program, but of course that does not matter because the whole thing is little more than a pretext to attack the country, as Saddam’s illusory weapons of mass destruction provided the pretext to invade and occupy Iraq (a “liberation” that has so far cost more than 200,000 Iraqi lives; added to the 1.5 million during more than a decade of sanctions, and the 100,000 or more killed during Bush the Elder’s initial invasion, the Bush crime family, with the help of their ghoulish “son,” Bill Clinton, have killed close to two million people, a truly Naziesque accomplishment). “I would advocate, prior to any use of force, that we try to assemble a group of nations that would take tough actions to try to effect a regime change: e.g. a blockade against Iran’s imports of refined petroleum products,” the madman Woolsey continues. Of course, an embargo is an act of war and it would be perfectly natural for the Iranians to retaliate, although they would be insane to do so, as this would provide yet another juicy pretext for the neocons, who are attempting to get a rise out of them like a schoolyard bully tries to get a rise out of a smaller kid on the playground in preparation of trouncing him. It should be remembered that the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor in response to the United States blockading their access to petroleum (and Roosevelt, like the neocons, was shopping for a pretext to get a peaceful and non-violent American populace behind yet another bankster war). As for details sketching out the impending attack, Woolsey defers to McInerney, who declares the neocons want to “solve this diplomatically” (horse feathers). “If diplomacy fails then [Russia and China] must be prepared to help in the military option. We must find out if they will accept Iranian nuclear hegemony in the region. My sources say they will not. So we must get them involved.” Next, the old war horse spells out the specifics: My military option is primarily led by a stealth force of 64 AC composed B2s, F 22s and F 117s and 400 non-stealth aircraft, plus 500 cruise missiles hitting 1500 aim points with precision weapons. The targets would be the Nuclear Development facilities, Air Defense forces, Air Forces, Naval Forces, Shahab 3 missile forces and Command and Control nodes over a 36–48 hour time frame. I would then let pre-planned covert forces assist the Iranian people in taking their country back with precision air support as required. This is the model used in Afghanistan and we must be training it now. It will take time but Iran is ripe to have this implemented. We have at most one year until we must take action in my opinion. I believe Israel must be kept out of this. They will only complicate a complicated problem. No kidding. However, everybody in the Middle East knows the attack will be launched at Israel’s behest, and they will react accordingly. In fact, the neocons are banking on a violent reaction, even the murder of innocent Israeli and American civilians, as this will give them even more reason to call for total war, which is of course their ultimate plan, thus further militarizing society and trashing what remains of the Constitution. In order to go after the neocon laundry list of enemies, including China and Russia, American society needs to be radically transformed, or as the neocon Norman Podhoertz tells it, Americans must grow stomachs, that is inure themselves to mass murder, carnage, skyrocketing cancer rates (by way of depleted uranium) and even the death of their children, who are of course considered little more than bullet stoppers and ends to a mean by the Straussian neocons, as countless children were little more than cannon fodder for the likes of Mao, Stalin, and Hitler. McInerney may be so deluded as to actually believe attacking Iran will translate into “the Iranian people in taking their country back”. He casually mentions Afghanistan as a template (meanwhile, the current reality of Afghanistan—the CIA and ISI spawned Taliban has experienced a comeback—is not allowed to intrude). Of course, this slide will ultimately work in favor of the neocon agenda, as the resurgence of fanatical Islam, nurtured over the years by numerous intel ops engineered by a panoply of subvert-and-spook organizations (i.e., the CIA, Pentagon, Mossad, MI6, with help from German and Italian intelligence), will work nicely into the “clash of civilizations” propaganda war. Timmerman can hardly contain himself, declaring he is “not used to being in such good company,” and thanks McInerney “for laying out one of several military strike packages should our political leaders fail to seize one of several better alternatives now available,” and then reemphasizes the phantom claim Iran is about two baby steps away from a “Hiroshima-type weapon” (after all, he declares, “high school seniors in the U.S. have replicated it, and Iran has invested heavily in science and math education,” thus hinting Muslims should probably be prevented from learning math, never mind we wouldn’t have math if the Muslims had not preserved in through the European Dark Ages). But never mind, the neocons possess “a secret weapon, and that is the people of Iran. There are strong indications of a broad-based rejection of the regime and pro-American sentiments among the Iranian people. New defectors arrive almost daily in the West. The most recent is Amir Abas Fakrevar, a student leader who has joined the High Council of the Iranian Referendum Movement. He managed to escape Iran in late April 2006.” More horse feathers, as the people of Iran will side with the mullahs the moment the infidels attack, as people usually side with the government when foreigners strike. Of course, the neocons said this about Iraq as well—and we have witnessed how that one turned out. As for Amir Abas Fakrevar (aka Fakhr-Avar), it turns out he wrote a book entitled The Shah Is Not Here (according to Reza Bayegan, a neocon shill who writes for Frontpage, the Iranians loved the Shah, especially when his SAVAK was pulling out their fingernails with pliers). Moreover, this poor beleaguered 30-year old Iranian “student” is tight with Richard Perle and Michael Ledeen (for more than you’d probably ever want to know about Amir-Abbas Fakhr-Avar, see Is Fakhravar A Fraud? posted on the Moon of Alabama blog). Neocons have a charming—if not for the blood-stained character of all neocon discourse—habit of talking in the past tense when they are speaking about things in the present. For instance, McInerney suggests exploiting “the divergent population of 51% Persian, 34% Azerbaijanis and Kurds, and 2% Arabs plus others. Virtually all the oil is located in the southwest region close to the Persian Gulf and very vulnerable to being isolated and to covert action. Seventy percent of the population is under 30 and the jobless rate hovers near 20 percent. This is a perfect combination for a covert campaign.” As we know, thanks in part to Seymour Hersh, with speculation added recently by former CIA analyst Ray McGovern, the Pentagon long ago launched covert ops against the people of Iran, sparking violence and sectarian strife in Kurdistan, Khuzestan, and Balochistan. “The president hasn’t notified the Congress that American troops are operating inside Iran,” Sam Gardiner, a retired US Army colonel who specializes in war-game scenarios, told Asia Times. “So it’s a very serious question about the constitutional framework under which we are now conducting military operations in Iran.” Finally, Timmerman reveals the hatred of neocons for the elected leader of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. “I think President Bush should take the opportunity presented by the 18-pages of drivel from Ahmadinejad to send a reply—not to the bearded boy president, whom I leave to Tom McInerney and the U.S. Air Force—but to the people of Iran,” in other words, Ahmadinejad should be murdered by way of bunker-buster (or “mini-nuke”), never mind he was selected to lead the nation by the very people Timmerman and the neocons tell us they want to liberate (for an example of this kind-heartedness, consider the 200,000 plus dead Iraqis since Bush’s invasion). No doubt many Iranians recall none too fondly the last time the United States replaced one of their leaders. It was 1953 and the United States and Britain conducted a joint operation that essentially “ended Iran’s drive to assert sovereign control over its own resources and helped put an end to a vibrant chapter in the history of the country’s nationalist and democratic movements,” as the National Security Archive summarizes. “These consequences resonated with dramatic effect in later years. When the Shah finally fell in 1979, memories of the U.S. intervention in 1953, which made possible the monarch’s subsequent, and increasingly unpopular, 25-reign intensified the anti-American character of the revolution in the minds of many Iranians.” ---------------------------------------------------
Prison Planet.tv: The Premier Multimedia Subscription Package: Download and Share the Truth! Please help our fight against the New World Order by giving a donation. As bandwidth costs increase, the only way we can stay online and expand is with your support. Please consider giving a monthly or one-off donation for whatever you can afford. You can pay securely by either credit card or Paypal. Click here to donate. |
