|
|
|
|
|
Conspiracy Deniers Delight In Their Attempt to Debunk the Obvious John F. McManus Evidence that the leaders of Canada, Mexico and the U.S. are working to merge the three countries into a North American Union has alerted and alarmed many. It has also stimulated some conspiracy deniers. But their denials skip over numerous reasons for concluding that a plot, similar to the one that brought 27 nations under the rule of a European Union, does indeed exist. Follow this link to the original source: "The Amero Conspiracy" The Boston Globe's Drake Bennett provided many facts that have led to the conclusion that a conspiracy designed to merge the three nations of North America actually exists. But even though he offered some evidence that it does exist, he confidently told his readers that "there is no such thing" as the plot being pointed to by many. In other words, we should continue to trust our leaders who have nothing but our best interests at heart. Bennett admits that Messrs. Bush, Martin, and Fox created the Security and Prosperity Partnership in 2005. And yes, Martin and Fox have been succeeded by Calderon and Harper who have continued to meet with Bush in subsequent SPP sessions. He mentions, but refuses to consider, the hugely important significance of the Council on Foreign Relations' publication Building a North American Community that, he notes, seeks "a common North American security perimeter, the development of a biometric North American border pass, and the adoption of a North American tariff."
Bennett pointed to Professor Robert Pastor, one of prime movers behind these supposedly benign initiatives, as the author of book calling for "economic integration" and "an amero currency" for the three nations. And he quotes the warning of financial analyst Steve Previs that the "amero" will "have a big impact on everybody's life in Canada, the U.S., and Mexico." But, not to worry, it's all a paranoid conspiracy theory, says the Globe's writer. And he points to agreement about his assessment issued by professors at the University of Florida and Harvard University. That ought to do it, right? Aren't professors the final arbiters? Given the small amount of evidence supplied by Bennett, it's unlikely that anyone would agree that a conspiracy exists to merge the three nations, overturn the Declaration of Independence, and scrap the U.S. Constitution and its Canadian and Mexican counterparts. The amount of evidence needed to persuade anyone to arrive at a conclusion will vary. For those who might need a few more indications that a conspiracy does exist, we offer a few bits of evidence left out by Bennett. For instance:
More evidence can be assembled for any Doubting Thomases. But space limitations must be honored. Suffice it to say that the border hasn't been secured, as journalist Jerome Corsi has indicated, because there's no intention to secure it. A single political and economic entity known as the North American Union doesn't allow for individual national border security. But a merger of the three nations requires a common security perimeter that ignores national boundaries. Which is why a growing number of Congressmen, alerted by the "conspiracy theorists," have co-sponsored legislation to block the NAU and scuttle all aspects of the entire plot.
|
||||
