|
Former
NFL Star Latest To Question 9/11 Official Story
Ex-Dallas Cowboys lineman Stepnoski tells Indiana newspaper
of doubts
Former Dallas Cowboys and Houston Oilers lineman Mark
Stepnoski has become the latest notable public figure to question the
government's official 9/11 story, speaking to an Indiana newspaper about
his fascination with the 9/11 truth movement and his doubts about Building
7, insider trading, and the alleged hijackers.
Stepnoski was a highly regarded offensive lineman in
the 90's, winning two Super Bowls while with the Cowboys and was a five
time Pro Bowler, attending the game from 1992 through 1996. Since his
retirement from the game in 2000 he has become politically active in
arguing for the decriminalization of marijuana.
In an interview
with the Indiana-based Erie Times-News published yesterday, Stepnoski
speaks at length about his deep research into the events of 9/11 and
why the official explanation seems suspect.
(Article continues below)
"It interests me because I
don't think we're being told truth about what really happened
on Sept. 11, 2001. I'm highly skeptical of government accounts
of what really happened. It's one of those things that really
won't go away. I've been reading about that event and studying
about it a great deal. I've read several books and a lot online
pretty much since it happened, just because I'm curious about
it and just because of other events in our historical past, like
the Kennedy assassination for example," the newspaper quotes
Mark Stepnoski as saying.
"Before anyone wants to try and pigeonhole me as conspiracy
theorist, it's like a lot of things. If you're just willing to scratch
beneath the surface and do a little research maybe you can find out
some things, maybe more people would be more skeptical about our government's
involvement with 9/11," he added.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
END GAME: Blueprint For Global Enslavement has arrived! Click
here to subscribe and watch online in high quality and
download versions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stepnoski goes on to highlight the collapse of WTC
7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell into its own footprint in under seven
seconds at 5:20pm on 9/11 despite not being hit by a plane. News
networks like BBC and CNN reported the collapse of the building before
it happened, leading some to allege that the perpetrators of the
attack were feeding the media a script of events yet to unfold.
"We're being lied to. That's what bothers me
the most. There's a lot of evidence in almost any area of the entire
event, and you can bring up a lot of inconsistencies and unanswered
questions just about the event itself. Two of the three steel-frame
buildings that day collapsed due to fire, and that's never happened
before, never in history. But that day it happened three times, including
one building that didn't get hit by a plane. Building Number 7 didn't
get hit by a plane and it went straight down in six and a half seconds.
In the vast majority of U.S. cities that would have been the tallest
building in the city. It had nothing but a couple of small fires on
a couple of floors, but it fell down at free-fall speed in six and a
half seconds. There are several engineers and architects who have made
the argument that it was a controlled demolition because, again, there's
never been a steel building collapse due to fire. So how can it happen
three times in one day?" said Stepnoski.
He went on to discuss insider trading in the days before
the attack as well as the disputed identities of the alleged hijackers.
"A whole lot of insider trading occurred beforehand,
and that's a huge red flag that there was foreknowledge of the event.
There were large financial transactions made ahead of time, a lot of
trades made to buy stock in United and American airlines beforehand
with the expectation that those stocks were going to go down drastically.
A lot of the hijackers from the list released by FBI -- a lot of those
guys are alive. Many, many guys on the list are the wrong identity.
One guy was a pilot for Saudi Airlines, another guy is living in Lebanon
and is suing the U.S. government to clear his name."
Stepnoski concluded by questioning the flight that
hit the Pentagon as well as the fabled impartiality and scope of the
9/11 Commission.
"I'm compelled because as time goes on there is a greater and
greater growing voice among people in areas involved with different
aspect of that day. You have pilots speaking about what would be involved
with trying to fly a plane into the Pentagon that day in the way that
it was portrayed. You have architects and engineers speaking out over
the actual explanation that jet fuel could melt steel and cause buildings
to collapse. You have former people who worked in the Bush administration
or the military who have come forward to express doubt about the official
story," he said.
"Consider the fact that the Bush administration really fought
the formation of the 9/11 Commission the whole way. It fought over
who was going to head it and who was going to be on it. Initially
Henry Kissinger was supposed to be the chairman, but he stepped aside
because of conflict of interest issues. The commission didn't come
together until a year and a half after the event. ... And you think
about how the government spent $15 million on the commission to investigate
9/11, which sounds like a lot. But then you make the comparison that
the government spent $40 million to investigate the Monica Lewinsky
affair. I certainly share a lot of those views."
Refreshingly, the usual sardonic dismissal of such
comments on behalf of the article's author was absent this time, leaving
the reader to make up their own mind.
Stepnoski is the fourth public figure inside ten days
to speak on the record about 9/11.
Last week comedian George
Carlin, along with actors Mark
Ruffalo and the legendary
Martin Sheen all spoke publicly about their suspicions regarding
the official story.
Why is it noteworthy that an ex-NFL star is talking
about 9/11 truth? For one it shows that beyond the hundreds
of scientists, physicists, professors, other experts, and ex-government
and military officials who have all gone public in questioning 9/11,
a large body of the general public from all walks of life are now getting
educated about 9/11 truth.
In addition, celebrities have instant access to a vocal
platform and can use their influence to bring attention to an important
subject, instantly bypassing the gatekeeping media and forcing a national
debate about 9/11 truth.
---------------------------------------------------
Prison
Planet.tv: The Premier Multimedia Subscription Package: Download and Share
the Truth!
Please help
our fight against the New World Order by giving a donation. As bandwidth
costs increase, the only way we can stay online and expand is with your
support. Please consider giving a monthly or one-off donation for whatever
you can afford. You can pay securely by either credit card or Paypal.
Click here
to donate.
FAIR
USE NOTICE
|
Email
