Visitors:
       
       
Contact: Paul@propagandamatrix.com     Copyright © PropagandaMatrix.com 2001-2003. All rights reserved.
• Yahoo Instant
Message
• E Mail Paul
• E Mail News Articles
E Mail This Page

• AOL Instant Message
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:
Email:
Subscribe  Unsubscribe 
Subscribe to the Newsgroup
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Parents Would Be Jailed For Smacking Children

Sky News | July 5 2004

Comment: The State will now be rearing your children. Bisexuals running sex education lessons teaching 6-year-olds how to masturbate and 'experiment' with members of the same sex. But can parents choose how to discipline their own kids? Oh no. People who intentionally hurt children are already criminals and a law will not stop them from doing it! This only affects law-abiding parents. The irony is that all these liberals calling for Blair's nanny state to be beefed up to save the children are the same ones advocating aborting little babies who it is now proven can smile, yawn and run their eyes in the earliest stages of pregnancy.

Parents could be jailed if they discipline their children with anything more than a light slap.

The House of Lords will debate the issue later today when it looks at updating the defence of reasonable chastisement.

But the Government is refusing to allow an outright ban fearing it may lead to a flood of legal claims.

It is backing a "middle road" strategy.

The new law would allow mild smacks but prohibit excessive punishment.

Health Secretary Dr John Reid has said he believed most people would back the Government's approach.

But anti-smacking campaigners have accused Ministers of letting children down.

Tony Blair and Education Secretary Charles Clarke have decided to allow a free vote on a proposal to limit the use of the traditional defence of "reasonable chastisement".

The proposal is contained in an amendment to the Bill tabled by Liberal Democrat peer Lord Lester of Herne Hill.

Under Lord Lester's amendment, any parent who inflicted actual bodily harm on a child could be prosecuted and would no longer have the protection of the reasonable chastisement defence, which dates back to 1860.

"When a parent smacks a child, they are to some extent losing control," said Lord Lester.

"Under my amendment, parents will still be able to smack their children if they don't harm them physically or mentally."

A Department for Education and Skills spokesman said a wide-ranging ban on smacking would be "an unwarranted intrusion into family life".