Copyright © PropagandaMatrix.com 2001-2005. All rights reserved.
E Mail This Page

Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:
Email:
Subscribe  Unsubscribe 
Subscribe to the Newsgroup
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Get Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson's books, ALL Alex's documentary films, films by other authors, audio interviews and special reports. Sign up at Prison Planet.tv - CLICK HERE.

Inauguration Protests Dubbed Out By TV Networks?

Paul Joseph Watson | January 21 2005

A strange sentence in a UPI report suggests that TV news networks covering the inauguration dubbed out the jeers of protesters.

The UPI report states, "Both groups were in areas that required a ticket to gain admission but were still some distance from the podium where Bush was speaking."

"The interruption was not immediately seen on television, but the jeering could be heard as poorly timed applause for portions of Bush's speech."

What does this mean? That the jeers were replaced by artificial applause?

Alex Jones watched the morning coverage of the inauguration and stated that he noticed the sound would be turned down whenever jeers started to be heard in the backgrouund.

Either this or the commentator would suddenly chime in to drown out the protesters by talking about how great Lord Bush was and much he is devoted to preserving freedom (while every action he takes destroys it).

This contradicts a blurb on the Drudge Report which states, "CNN AIRS PROTESTER SHOUTING 'F#%& BUSH' SIX TIMES... NETWORK DOESN'T CUT AUDIO FEED OF PROLONGED JEER... DEVELOPING...

It was admitted that the debates were staged and that the audience members were hand picked weeks in advance. Every public forum Bush appears at is attended by a carefully screened audience and they are given questions to ask Bush. If they stray from the script, the microphone is turned off.

Bush has slipped up on two seperate occasions when addressing the media and let it be known that White House press conferences are scripted.

Therefore is it hard to believe, in the light of the Armstrong fiasco, that the TV networks had come to a nice little 'arrangement' with the Bush's would-be Goebbels PR pimp Karl Rove and agreed to can any evidence that the Emperor was being protested?