Copyright © PropagandaMatrix.com 2001-2005. All rights reserved.
E Mail This Page

Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:
Email:
Subscribe  Unsubscribe 
Subscribe to the Newsgroup
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Get Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson's books, ALL Alex's documentary films, films by other authors, audio interviews and special reports. Sign up at Prison Planet.tv - CLICK HERE.

Britain urges Bush to set out Iraq withdrawal timetable

London Telegraph | January 20 2005

Britain is urging America to announce a timetable for withdrawing coalition troops from Iraq over the next 18 months or more.

With a new Iraqi government due to take power after next week's elections, The Telegraph has learned that British officials believe the time is ripe for the coalition to announce an "indicative timetable" for its departure.

There would no firm deadline and the withdrawal would depend on the gradual ability of Iraq's armed forces to take over responsibility for security – probably not before the middle of next year. Such an announcement would be the first time the coalition had set a clear target for leaving.

British officials say that a timetable, however tentative, would signal an exit strategy, bolster the transitional government and undermine the insurgents' claim that America intended to occupy Iraq indefinitely.

The Government is hopeful that President George W Bush will agree to make a formal announcement within two or three months.

"Giving a timetable would be an important political signal that we intend to leave Iraq," a well-placed Whitehall source said. "The main Iraqi parties are already talking about when coalition forces should be drawn down. America knows it will have to deal with the issue soon."

Washington has resisted committing itself to a pull-out date for its 150,000 troops, fearing that it would be seen as a sign of weakness and encourage the gunmen.

Condoleezza Rice, who is expected to be confirmed today as the new secretary of state, said this week: "I am really reluctant to try to put a timetable on that because I think the goal is to get the mission accomplished - and that means that the Iraqis have to be capable of some things before we lessen our own responsibility."

But pressure is mounting in Washington for the administration to explain its exit strategy. A senior source there said: "After the Iraqi elections we have to look seriously at the extent of American and coalition military presence. The more you turn things over to the Iraqis, the less there is the need for an outside presence."

Such comments mark a change of emphasis by the US and Britain. Only last month Tony Blair's central message when he visited Baghdad was that the coalition was unshakable in its resolve to win the "battle between democracy and terror".

The biggest problem for a coalition exit strategy has been the often lamentable performance of the Iraqi forces, with units sometimes melting away when attacked.

Iraqi security forces have borne the brunt of recent attacks as the Jan 30 election date approaches.

Miss Rice said the security forces were doing "relatively well" but conceded: "They do need to address these questions of leadership, which then lead to problems with desertion and the like."