While the Obama administration is attempting to pass the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 in a hurry, NaturalNews
readers have begun actually reading the bill, and they're finding
some worrying language that should raise concern among people interested
in preserving health freedom and protecting the health of all Americans.
Specifically, one section of the economic stimulus bill designates
nearly a billion dollars for new vaccinations of children.
This was discovered by Elisha Celeste, a NaturalNews
reader. As stated in the bill:
$954,000,000 shall be used as an additional amount to carry out
the immunization
program authorized by section 317(a), (j), and (k)(1) of the Public
Health Service Act ("section 317 immunization program")
The issue of whether vaccinations
are actually helpful or harmful is hotly debated, of course. The pro-vaccine
camp believes that the human immune
system is a technological failure and that chemical intervention
is the only way to protect children. The anti-vaccine camp believes
that exposure to non-fatal infections
actually strengthens the immune system, creating stronger protections
against future infections. Thus, vaccines
actually interfere with normal, healthy immune function while injecting
children with dangerous chemicals and substances derived from sick,
diseased animals.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
NaturalNews is against childhood vaccines as explained in this article
that completely debunks conventional beliefs about vaccinations: http://www.naturalnews.com/025596.html
Genomics programs?
The economic stimulus bill also requests more than half a billion
dollars for "genomics programs", saying:
$545,000,000 shall be used as an additional amount to carry out
chronic disease,
health promotion, and genomics programs
What's interesting about this last quote is that it essentially says
this half a billion dollars should be used to carry out three things:
1) Chronic disease
programs
2) Health promotion
3) Genomics programs
I don't have a problem with the second point. "Health promotion" sounds
good (unless it's nothing more than mammograms and mental health
screening programs designed to sell more chemotherapy and psych drugs).
But what, exactly, is meant by the phrase "...to carry out chronic
disease"? And what is meant by "genomics programs"? Are we talking
about government-funded genetic experimentation on human babies, perhaps?
It wouldn't be the first time. See: http://www.naturalnews.com/019189.html
