|
CIA Foreknowledge of the Mumbai Attacks
9/11
Blogger
Monday, Dec 01, 2008
Yesterday, Outlookindia.com
reported that the CIA's station chief in Delhi approached one of
India's intelligence agencies, the Research
and Analysis Wing, and passed on a fairly specific warning;
"In mid-September this year, the CIA station chief in Delhi sought
an urgent meeting with his counterpart in R&AW to pass on some
critical inputs. This was part of an understanding that Indian and
American intelligence had institutionalised in the aftermath of 9/11.
From its assets in Pakistan and Afghanistan, American intelligence
had come to learn that the Lashkar-e-Toiba was planning to
launch a major terrorist attack in Mumbai, which would be carried
out from the sea."
Later in the article;
"By the middle of November, as Indian intelligence continued to check
out further inputs, the pieces of an intricate jigsaw puzzle began
to fall into place. Sources say they learnt that the attack
would come from the sea and that the Taj Hotel would be a major target.
However, it was not known whether this attack would be carried out
by planting bombs in the hotel or by terrorists carrying small arms.
Indian intelligence assessments were tilting towards bombs being planted
and security at the hotel was beefed up accordingly to prevent terrorists
from planting bombs inside the premises."
But the Hotel eased these security enhancements the week before the
attack, according
to the Chairman of the company that owned the Hotel where took the brunt
of the attacks;
"The Taj Mahal hotel in Mumbai, India, temporarily increased security
after being warned of a possible terrorist attack, the chairman of
the company that owns the hotel said Saturday.
But Tata Group Chairman Ratan Tata said those measures, which
were eased shortly before this week's terror attacks, could
not have prevented gunmen from entering the hotel."
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
So let's get this straight... the CIA and Indian intelligence have
figured out that Mumbai will be attacked, and Indian intelligence even
nailed down the Hotel, and warned the Hotel... so the Hotel slacked
off on security. Of course.
The Outlookindia report does not tell us that the Hotel stood down,
and this is not the only troubling aspect of the report. The article
parrots information from Indian intelligence about a fishing trawler
that the Indian Coast Guard "discovered", that just happens to be rich
with damning evidence;
"On November 18, R&AW passed on a specific advisory to the Coast
Guard, which serves as the Lead intelligence Agency for the coastal
area. The advisory asked the coast guard to intensify patrolling and
look out for a suspicious vessel, probably of Pakistani origin, which
had sailed off from Karachi. While the coast guard began to patrol
the area with renewed intensity, the terrorists had an entirely different
plan.
According to details available with Indian intelligence and the information
given by the terrorist who was picked up by the Mumbai police in an
encounter near Chowpatty, the terrorists hijacked an Indian fishing
boat, the Kuber, somewhere near Pakistani waters. They beheaded the
majority of the boat's crew of six and only allowed one crew-member,
Amarsinh Solanki, to live so that he could help them with navigating
the boat to Mumbai. The coast guard found a Global Positioning
System abandoned on the fishing trawler that was drifting nearly four
nautical miles off the coast of Mumbai early on Thursday, November
27 morning, several hours after the terrorist attack began...
...What has surprised investigators piecing together the details
of the attack is that the GPS recovered from the abandoned
trawler, Kuber, had two maps fed into it to aid navigation. One was
a route from Karachi that was plotted quite close to the Indian coast,
while a return route had also been mapped into the GPS from the Mumbai
coast back to Karachi. "We think this was done to give the
terrorists some semblance of hope that they would go back home after
a successful raid," a top security official told Outlook. The
fact that these two maps were fed into the GPS has confirmed that
there was some help from people with a naval or army background, and
had extensive knowledge of navigation at sea.
...Meanwhile, investigators are poring through the call data details
downloaded from the satellite phone also recovered from the
abandoned trawler. Many of the call details have revealed
numbers that have been traced back to the LeT's (Lashkar-e-Toiba)
chief of operations, Muzamil, as well as to Lakhvi. Interestingly,
the international SIM cards recovered from the bodies of the killed
terrorists correspond to the intelligence picked up earlier, when
Muzamil had asked his Bangladesh operative Yayah, to procure them.
How convenient. The gunmen left behind brutally damning evidence just
to erase any lingering doubts that anyone might have had about the origins
of this attack.
This reminds me of the luggage allegedly
left behind in Boston, on 9/11 by Mohamed Atta;
"Former federal terrorism investigators say a piece of luggage hastily
checked in at the Portland, Maine, airport by a World Trade Center
hijacker on the morning of Sept. 11 provided the Rosetta stone
enabling FBI agents to swiftly unravel the mystery of who carried
out the suicide attacks and what motivated them.
A mix-up in Boston prevented the luggage from connecting with the
plane that hijackers crashed into the north tower of the trade center.
Seized by FBI agents at Boston's Logan Airport, investigators said,
it contained Arab-language papers revealing the identities
of all 19 hijackers involved in the four hijackings, as well as information
on their plans, backgrounds and motives."
It also reminds me of the evidence bundle conveniently
dropped in Memphis that was used to set up (and convict) James Earl
Ray of the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.;
"On April 4, 1968, within minutes after the shooting of Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr., a local police officer discovered a Remington 30-06
rifle, several unused bullets, and other effects that belonged to
James Earl Ray, wrapped inside a blanket, outside Canipe's Amusement
store. The owner of the store recalled someone dropping the
package at his door before the time of the assassination."
The over-eager evidence-droppers in this case jumped the gun. Like
Atta's luggage, and Ray's self-damning evidence bundle, there is something
about that fishing trawler that is just too good to be true. The fact
that the article uses intelligence sources so uncritically is in itself
questionable.
As Michel
Chossudovsky comments;
"Were the ISI to have been involved in a major covert operation directed
against India, the CIA would have prior knowledge regarding
the precise nature and timing of the operation.The ISI does
not act without the consent of its US intelligence counterpart."
We know now that the CIA did indeed have "prior knowledge", derived
from its own "assets", at least according to the spin from Outlookindia.com.
|