| Contact: Paul@propagandamatrix.com Copyright © PropagandaMatrix.com 2001-2005. All rights reserved. |
|
|
| FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |
U.S. threatened North Korea 5 months after Iraq invasion
World Tribune | December 29 2004
Only months after invading Iraq in 2003, the U.S. warned North Korea that it had designated the overseas transfer of nuclear materials as a "red line" that could warrant the use of force against the communist country, a former U.S. envoy on North Korea said.
In an interview with Japan's Yomiuri Shimbun newspaper,
Charles Pritchard, former U.S. State Department special envoy for negotiations
with North Korea, said he had conveyed this position to North Korea through
diplomatic channels in New York in August 2003, and that the communist regime
had accepted it as credible U.S. policy. Pritchard was serving in the capacity
of special envoy at the time.
Pritchard warned North Korean officials that immediate measures would be
taken if Pyongyang transferred nuclear materials to other countries, crossing
the red line.
It was the first time anyone has gone on record as saying that the U.S. had informed the North of a nuclear threshold over which it must not pass, Yomiuri said on Dec. 23.
The Bush administration last year drew a "red line" beyond which North Korea would not be allowed to expand its arsenals. Previously it had refrained from setting such a "red line," apparently out of concern that it might provoke North Korea to escalate its nuclear activities.
The previous Clinton administration had declared reprocessing spent nuclear fuel a "red line" North Korea should not cross, according to diplomats in Seoul.
U.S. officials have not specified what type of action the U.S. might take if North Korea crossed the line, but the Japanese newspaper said a military strike could not be ruled out.
The "red line" for North Korea's nuclear activities has often been described as moves to eject UN inspectors from the atomic facility, restart a nuclear reactor shut down under a 1994 U.S.-North Korean pact and move spent fuel rods for reprocessing to extract plutonium. Some say an actual nuclear test would be a "red line."
North Korea recently said it "successfully" completed reprocessing its 8,000 spent nuclear fuel rods and diverted plutonium from them to strengthen its "nuclear deterrence." Experts say if the 8,000 fuel rods were efficiently converted, they could produce 30 to 35 kilograms of weapons-grade plutonium to make up to seven atomic bombs.
Raising the stake in the nuclear
standoff, a North Korean nuclear official confirmed earlier this month that
in September 2003 Pyongyang reactivated the 5-megawatt reactor at Yongbyon,
the country's main nuclear complex, which was frozen under a 1994 accord.