Mark Roberts: 9/11 "Debunker" or just Dishonest?
Mark Roberts is most well known as a 9/11 truth "Debunker". One of the more common statements that he repeatedly makes is:
"The 9/11 "Truth" movement has made a few hundred significant claims in the past few years, none of which have been true. Don't believe me? Then name a significant claim that you get right, and prove it."
I'd like to take up this challenge. While it is true that 9/11 activists have not always promoted credible information, it is also true that the official story is obviously problematic. I could sit here all day poking holes in the official "conspiracy theory" as many have done, but I will just ask Mr. Roberts three easy questions:
1. Name one single person fired or
reprimanded within the U.S. government (FBI, CIA, NORAD, FAA,
NSA, or Bush Administration) for the 9/11 attacks.
2. NORAD is responsible for air defense. Mr. Roberts, how many
contradictory explanations did NORAD give for their
failure to intercept any planes on 9/11?
3. It is an established fact that NORAD is responsible for air defenses and no planes on 9/11 were even intercepted despite the fact this is standard procedure.
Despite this fact, how many days later was the man in charge of NORAD promoted?
Assuming that Mr. Roberts can answer these questions correctly, why isn't he a member of the 9/11 truth movement? I am at a loss, unless he believes that it is acceptable for NORAD to change their story three times without a criminal investigation to take place, no one to be fired or demoted, and Richard Myers, the person in charge of NORAD on 9/11 to get promoted 3 days later.
As I explained,
To believe in the 9/11 “official story” is to believe in a massive, coordinated, and “coincidental” failure at many levels in which those most responsible for preventing the attacks were not fired or reprimanded and instead promoted.I wonder why Mark Roberts and other apologists for the 9/11 official story never go near facts such as these? I'll have to assume it's because they can't be "debunked".
911truth.org: THE TOP 40REASONS TO DOUBT THE OFFICIAL STORY OF SEPTEMBER 11th, 2001
Monisha Bansal, 9/11 Families Want New Probe, Questions Answered, http://www.cnsnews.com/, September 12, 2006. “According to the group, 70 percent of their questions were either not adequately addressed by the commission or not addressed at all.”
David Ray Griffin, The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie, May 22, 2005, http://www.911truth.org/
Copyright © Global Matrix Enterprises 2001-2008. All rights reserved. Legal Notice.