Democratic Representative Rush Holt (NJ-12) has been stonewalled
in his efforts to get answers from the DOJ and the FBI about the status
of investigations into the 2001 anthrax attacks on the federal government.
The anthrax letters originated from his district.
On December 11, 2006, Holt and a bipartisan group of Congressmen
requested that Attorney General Gonzales “direct the FBI to
provide Congress with a comprehensive briefing on the status of the
five year-old anthrax investigation.” The DOJ refused.
On March 2, 2007, he sent this
request to Henry Waxman and John Conyers:
“The Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation
have openly asserted their belief that Congress should be kept in
the dark on this vital national security issue. Mr. Chairman, I
ask for your help in determining why we have been unable to bring
the perpetrators of this heinous act to justice. It is time
to provide effective oversight of the Department of Justice and
the FBI.”
Why would the DOJ and FBI stonewall this Congressman's request for
information on their investigations into a crime committed in his
own district?
I was surprised and intrigued by a comment from DKos member 'joanneleon'
that the anthrax attacks came around the time of the Patriot Act was
passed. Was this true?
I did a quick little research and - surprise - it is true.
The anthrax letter sent to Democrat Tom Daschle was opened by an aide
on October 15, 2001. Nine days later the House passed the Patriot Act.
Apparently, some of them didn't read it -- or at least, didn't read
it during the reauthorization in 2006, as we know from the revelation
about the US Attorney clause that was slipped in by the DOJ.
Did the hysteria and fear caused by the anthrax attacks play a factor
in the passage of the Patriot Act?
- Anthrax letters sent to Congress on October 9
- Tom Daschle letter opened on October 15
- 31 Capitol workers test positive for the presence of anthrax on
October 17
- Patriot Act passed the House on October 24 (Yeas: 357; Nays: 66)
- Patriot Act passed the Senate on October 25 (Yeas: 98; Nays: 1)
- Patriot Act signed into law by President Bush on October 26
The 31 Capitol workers include five Capitol police officers, three
of Democratic Senator Russ Feingold's staffers and 23 of Democratic
Senator Tom Daschle's staffers. Including the victims of the earlier
letters sent to media outlets, more than 22 people ultimately developed
anthrax infections. Five people died from inhalation anthrax.
Rep. Holt says:
“The FBI’s refusal to brief Members of Congress raises
serious concerns about the status of this investigation and whether
it is a true priority of the FBI, which appears to be no closer to
solving this act of bioterrorism than they were five years ago."
Holt wants answers about an act of bioterrorism conducted in his district.
The FBI and DOJ refuse to answer. Since the DOJ benefited from the passage
of the Patriot Act, isn't this just a little bit suspicious?
Don't we need some oversight into this?
[UPDATED: Wow. Thanks everyone for the great, informative
responses (and not too much tinfoil-hattery).
The more I look into this issue, the more it seems like an excellent
and needed subject of Congressional oversight. Talk about NOT PROTECTING
American citizens! Democrats could make a really strong statement about
who is really looking out for America's safety by demanding answers
into why this investigation has been stalled under the Bush Administration.
Let's ask Waxman and Conyers about it!]
