|
Visitors:
|
| Contact: Paul@propagandamatrix.com Copyright © PropagandaMatrix.com 2001-2003. All rights reserved. |
| La Sexuale, the Media, Behaviour Modification and Depopulation Lex Gerrard, MA BA (Hons) On the surface, it might seem ironic to suggest that there is a relationship between increased sexual voracity in a culture and depopulation. But, this essay will outline how sexual imagery and nuance in the media (advertising, television, the movies, etc.), here called "la sexuale," could be used to create particular social effects, and may ultimately lead to depopulation. Depopulation is the ultimate effect, but on the way to reaching that final destination, there are a series of other significant effects. As readers shall quickly discover, this author offers that behaviour modification is the penultimate goal on the road to the final end. The "why" of depopulation will not be defined. It will be up to the reader to discover the implications of this phenomenon. Pornography A term that needs no introduction, pornography can be loosely defined in the context of this essay as graphic depiction of the sex act. This needs to be more than just nudity or "la sexuale" for our purpose. Pornography may be, ironically, a lesser our worry when it comes to altering people's behaviour on a mass scale. It can be argued that pornography can strongly impact the psyche of viewers, sometimes to the end of a viewer emulating or desiring to emulate what is seen specifically or generally. However, it can also be argued that pornography serves as a cathartic device for releasing unsatisfied sexual urges through self-stimulation. The tension between these two definitions is recognized and allows us to set them aside; even if the latter understanding were demonstrated to be false it would not harm the rest of the thesis, as it does not hinge on pornography but on something else which is discussed below. More importantly is the fact that pornography is still viewed, as "naughty" and not for public enjoyment that leads to climax. More often than not, it is "la sexuale" material where sexual petting and the like is viewed by wider audiences in groups or individually: there is a strong case to be made that the widest audience along all demographics to experience what is being called "la sexuale" both individually and collectively exceeds the consumption of pornography. Unlike pornography, la sexuale material, due to its public consumption, does not lead to climax and thus release, as does the private viewing of pornography; instead, the viewer is undoubtedly left wanting more without fulfillment. La Sexuale La sexuale is sex act-like or sex act-implying material that is perceived in a variety of media including ads, television programs, movies, and even audio recordings. Included are the images of primary, but more often, secondary bodily sexual characteristics as well as obvious and covert or implied references to the sex act or the opportunity of possible sex engagement. This includes visual materials as well as spoken materials (which may be more insidious as we shall see). Generally, more pronounced depictions of phallic and gynic symbols which are used in ways that present themselves more plainly. The reason that cryptic or less conspicuous symbolism is left out is not that the effect is thought to be insignificant. Rather, it is excluded because the implementation of the la sexuale is softly in-your-face and hidden only for, say, comic effect wherein it is easily recognized. La sexuale is immediately sensed by anyone exposed to the material who has consciousness of sexual desire, and this fact is key. Recall advertisement images of close-ups of people eating ice cream, or of someone opening a bottle of champagne, and the soft "in-your-face-ness" of la sexual image becomes evident. Such images are embedded in television programs too. The premiere episode of the 2003 "reality" television show The Simple Life starring Paris Hilton, and Nicole Richie is a prime example of la sexuale in overt and covert forms. According to the plot, the two super-wealthy women are from ultra upscale California end up in a small town and are forced to life a "normal" life on a farm with a conservative middle-class family. Because of their skimpy fashion sense and "dumb blonde" routine, the audience is immediately exposed to overt and covert la sexuale material. However, a very striking instance of a verbal la sexuale moment that is of particular interest is an instance where the early twenty-something son of the farm family finishes a conversation with the two women and walks away. Behind his back, they converse about "how cute" he is, and Nicole proceeds to "jokingly" suggest they engage him in group sex. From this example, we can gather the following: 1. Small town (implying backward, unsophisticated) is contrasted by a metaphor for "cool outsiders" who come to redefine sexual dynamics 2. Three-some notion plays on a natural desire to be sexually desirable, luring the viewer into thinking that this is itself a desirable thing. It is reminiscent of the "harem" sexual dynamic: men with plenty of power and virility attract multiple sex partners, so the converse it also perceived to be true as well. 3. The statement implies that "rich" and "desirable" women do "that kind of thing," subliminally indicating that women aspirants of the "cool" (underlying notion is that want to be cool) must now up the ante and compete on this level if they expect to win the attention of men. Certainly it is not quite simply cause and effect, but it has an encouraging and conditioning influence. 4. It leaves the viewer wanting to participate imaginatively in such an activity, directing the viewer's creative capacities, thus framing the context of what a fantasy should be. 5. More generally, it discloses an upper class mentality and clique consciousness which reduces everything to "power over" events (Another good example is in Eyes Wide Shut at the orgy of the "elite", and classically, the Greco-Roman orgies of the elite who, by acting in this manner, demonstrated their God-like emulation of total power through limitless sexual generation opportunity and its all encompassing reach; hence, a "group-grope".) 6. The fact that it is a "reality" show makes the statement all the more influencing, as it cannot be discounted topically as something embedded by a writer into the script; instead, we are to see it as "normal" and within the realm of the "real". These points reveal how one phrase can have a dramatic effect on the perception of the viewer. Alone, in a vacuum, the effect is minimal, but recall that this entire class of co-enforcing messages is being metronomically repeated 24/7 in magazines, television, radio, movies and the internet. Viewers are encouraged to adopt the value through repetition; and, to repeat the message itself, further broadcasting it, as they see that it superficially yields ego-reinforcing rewards, such as eliciting laughs and blushing shock from others. The message evolves into what becomes the "norm" of interaction and relationships, first becoming a thing to be laughed at, but later after some time, develops arguably faster into an accepted value under multi-vectored conditions where similar messages are repeated potentially three-thousand times a day. Repetition of message is a well known public relations and advertising technique to cause a message to "stick" in communal consciousness; and, the simpler the message, the "better" it is, according to speech coaches and other PR people. Consider the effect of repetition as it plays on natural instinct; the messages' potential proves startling. As an important aside, further supporting this thesis, continuing with the Paris Hilton example, is the alleged existence of a "sex tape". This kind of phenomenon is in line with other publicity stunts orchestrated by celebrities like Pamela Anderson where "buzz" is generated by a video recording of sexual activity of the icon in question. Unlike the Anderson video(s) which are easily authenticated, the Hilton tape is not entirely clear, as the lighting is obscured through use of a night vision camera. Nevertheless, the tape reveals a person who bears sufficient resemblance to Ms. Hilton: whether or not it is her is irrelevant - the fantasy that it is her is more important, as it assists in building the image of the celebrity in a semi-concretely way, and fuels or compliments the "la sexuale" image. In the above section on pornography, it was contended that pornography was lesser threat. While this author maintains that position, it must be noted that celebrity pornography may be a beast unto itself, as unknown "porn-stars" do not impact the mass consciousness, or if so only in the "porn-star" capacity. Celebrity pornography, on the other hand, connects the public life of the star or icon, with a concrete expression of sexual behaviour that is emulatable. It is contended that this may super-charge the public "la sexuale" component. It would be of interest to examine the number of times "Paris Hilton sex tape" has been typed into internet/peer-to-peer download searches, and by whom. This author speculates that a large cross section of the population have searched it: people who would not normally have searched for pornography now have, because they have been spurred to do so by being a "fan" of Ms. Hilton and her reality television show. If such a survey could be conducted, results could serve as evidence demonstrating how "la sexuale" leads to increasing sex-drive and a search for its release. Alternatively, as opposed to the classic effect of pornography, given that it is of the celebrity genre, it demonstrates a "way" in which one can be like Hilton : she is an icon of the mass consciousness, an icon which men and women fantasize being with or like. Adolescent women are exposed to this icon on television and are also hearing about the sex-tape on gossip television programs or internet sites, leading to the downloading the video on a file sharing program to satiate curiosity. The subtext present here is: "this is Parris' behaviour. you like Parris, don't you?" And, men's perception is be directed as to the kind of female expression they are to look for and what to expect / demand of females. This effect is not one that is monocausially produced: it requires many repetitions and multi-media vectored exposures before it begins to modify behaviour. In a Jan. 4 2004 article entitled, US Girls Taught To Embrace Gay Passion Fashion, by Richard Luscombe of the UK publication, The Observer, it is demonstrated that there is a noticeable "trend" in the instances of "fashionable" bisexuality, particularly amongst young women, including teenagers. Evidently, the message is altering behaviour in America. Depopulation One might characterize the twentieth century as one of long lives, but also of massive pollution. But local efforts have led to lower pollution levels: modern urban landscapes manage sewage-born illnesses with effective management. Traditionally, many disease were born from ineffective waste management in urbanized areas, this is generally no longer a problem. A voluminous number of texts have been written documenting the mechanism of modern depopulation / and the genesis of post-industrial world illness through pollution in its various forms. This would also include chemical pollution of the pharmaceutical kind, a result of misdiagnosis, substance abuse, or the econo-political force feeding of unnecessary preservatives and additives. This is not the purpose of this section. This is section will examine a few aspects of depopulation under the theme of la sexuale. Namely, this means asking the question, how do manifestations of la sexuale and depopulation interrelate? Birth Control Without getting into a religious-style argument about whether or no birth control methods such as hormone replacements interfere with "the creator's plan for creation", as might be found in discussions on moral theology and reproduction, instead the effects will be examined. In many ways, the same "effects" can also be applied to abortion methods, as the end result is the same: the absence of offspring. The introduction of birth control allowed women and families to gain some control over their reproductive capacities while allowing them to engage in sexual intercourse. While there are many arguments about the morality of controlling reproduction, these discussions have not prevented large amounts of women to use diverse birth control methods, most popular of which, it can be argued, is the pill, or hormone replacement (also injection). This method is distinct from other methods available to women, since it is the only method that harmonically changes a woman's physiology. And, consequently, hormone salts are passed through the urine and into the water supply. Like condoms, birth control empowers both women and men with the notion that they can engage in sexual intercourse with perceptually few consequences. However, the consequences are not necessarily few. First, the current perception of becoming pregnant is now a notion to be feared. No longer is it a "blessing" to become pregnant; instead, it has become a problem to be managed. Contributing factors are certainly economic, where a child may not be provided for and the profound lifestyle changes that accompany a new life. However, reproduction itself also carries a stigma for women, as if reproduction was an act which deserves scorn. An examination of national birth rates in the most "wired" or media dependent countries shows that the majority of the population are choosing not to become pregnant, which is having a depopulation effect. In addition to this direct population lowering effect, female hormones are entering the water supply, and are suspected of contributing to lower of sperm count in developed nations. The Telegraph, a UK paper, printed an article on Jan. 5, 2004 called UK Sperm Counts Down By 30% In Last 14 Years. The article suggested that sperm counts are on the decline with evidence to show that a significant contributing fact may be the presence of estrogens in the drinking water, originating from hormone replacement. Birth control use, supported by la sexuale lifestyle of multiple partners, limits population growth by, in effect, rendering the sex-act into a form of recreation. Not without, however, exposing the participants in la sexuale lifestyle to multiple disease vectors and the transmission of venereal and blood/saliva born pathogens. In passing, it should be noted that condom use is not a perfect solution to the transmission of pathogens, as flesh contract still occurs during coitus, and, it does not prevent the non-genital transmission of blood/saliva born infection. There is also controversy about the permeability of condom barriers and the passing of some miniscule pathogens through latex "pores." Multiple-partners La sexuale encourages experimentation and an open sexual lifestyle. Treating the sex-act like a Petri-dish for psycho-sexual experimentation, participants in la sexual culture are enjoined to "maximize" their pleasure by increasing their repertoire of sexual abilities with the maximum number of partners. This was directly shown in the Parris Hilton example above. The concept of polygamy, or multiple partners, in the restricted sense (multiple wives/husbands) is not a new concept. In fact, from a genetic diversity perceptive, such a concept makes sense under certain circumstances. However, this is not the kind of sexual relationships that la sexuale promotes, as it still involves an agreement of relationship where the parties involved are committed to the relationship by a vow of exclusivity. Interestingly, mainstream media and Hollywood generally take a condescending tone when addressing the polygamy either in Mormon or Islamic contexts. Generally, these relationships are portrayed as "backwater" or "oppressive" in some way. No doubt, individual cases could be scrutinized in such a manner, but it is erroneous to characterize all who have polygamous relationships as such. Instead, the multi-partnered behaviour encouraged by la sexuale depends on the absence of permanent bonds between its participants: the door is always open for "fresh meat", as it is sometimes called. Multiple-partners, coupled with sexual activity alluded to in the above Paris Hilton example, includes such practices as recreational bisexualism and group-sex. The most alarming features are the social effects and the disease vectors. Briefly, these two concerns are significant contributors to depopulation in the following ways: 1. They shun the creating of pair bonds which would normally produce offspring, redefining that pregnancy is a problem to be solved. (Multiple, ever changing partners is "suggested" over pairs, by nuance) 2. They contribute to depopulation by lowering instances of pregnancy which lead to birth. (Either by birth control or by terminating pregnancy) 3. They maximize disease vectors, both the conventional venereal diseases and other blood/saliva born diseases. (Including: hepatitis, meningitis, and possibly CJD or human Mad Cow disease - as reported, for example, by the BBC on Dec. 17, 2003, that blood donors have transmitted CJD to blood product recipients) 4. They contribute to the ever-alarming phenomenon of commodification of living beings for consumption. In an almost cannibalistic fashion, people become a kind of sexual crop to be harvested for an ever-famished consumer, of whom the harvested is also the harvester. This arguably contributes to the lessening of human dignity, as the person and the person's perception of personhood is reduced to that of marketable commodity, further compounding depopulation by perceiving human life, as a matter of product line, and, if inconvenient one to be discontinued. Conclusion What appears to be playful shock content or erotic media spectacles, when analyzed, are discovered to be part of a much more serious means to an end. There can be no doubt that depopulation initiatives, since the 1960s introduction of "the Pill" have been occurring, despite the increased visibility of erotic material and eroto-suggestive material, which, on the surface, might lead one to conclude that an increase in pregnancies is forthcoming. This is only true on a global scale. While the global population continues to increase, the birthrate, amongst Australians, Canadians, and Europeans, is on the decline. Recent projections by the US Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) in a report titled, "Replacement Migration: Is it a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?" indicates that the birthrates in Canada and Europe are so low and will continue to decline, that massive immigration will be needed to fill the workforce. And, while overall US population is expected to rise, the birthrate amongst European Americans is approximately half of what it is for Americans of other ethnicity, according to the CDC's NCHS 2003 Fact sheet on US birthrates. This is in-sync with the declines in Australia, Canada, and Europe. Interestingly, these figures coincide with the "successful" birth control programs in affluent European countries, where birth control is affordable and available to an "educated" population. It also coincides with trends in highly wired countries where "la sexuale" media's mores has saturated the technologically dependent, consumer society, placing person and sexuality are placed on the same playing field as products. It is ironic to think that the prosperity, concentration of wealth, and technological advancements associated with European nations and their euro-colonies such as Australia, Canada and the US may inevitably depopulate these societies by way of their own techno-culturally controlled media which shape thought and behaviour, ultimately toward a self-destructive end. It appears that the traditional "haves", at least in terms of passing on their genetic material, are becoming "have-nots". Down the line, however, as more developing nations become wired and migrant populations replace the aging middle-class in media saturated contexts, the same fate, this author predicts, will await them as well. Lex Gerrard is an independent researcher and hold degrees in religious and media studies. He can be reached at lexgerrard@hotmail.com |
|
|